As an admin I want to view all existing supply lines so that I can troubleshoot requisition problems as needed.
User with admin rights can view supply lines page in Administration tab
User has ability to search for Supply Lines by "Supplying Facility". The search box matches the UI style guide with dropdown select options.
Supplying Facility search list is populated only with facilities that are facility type = warehouse
When user goes to Supply Lines page, a paginated table with the existing Supply Lines is displayed (top 10)
Supply Lines table has default sort order by Supplying Facility Name
Supply Lines table displays Supplying Facility Name, Supervisory Node, Program, and Action
User can click View action to view more details about the Supplying Facility
Supplying Facility page shows all details associated with Supply Lines that are uneditable
Editing is out of scope for this ticket
Is the identifier for "Facility exports orders" in V3 schema?
Yes, I have also re-tested on the Test server, and issue #1 is fixed. I do not get any duplicate results appearing on the screen now. Screenshot attached:
Thanks for adding #2 to the Tech Debt page and adding #3 as a future ticket. FYI about that future ticket. I definitely feel like that added feature is needed for the page to be useful to admins/implementers.
this was mirrored after version 2. Would it make sense to add the Requisition Group Name to this view screen? Or should we add a list of facilities to the Supply Lines details page (admin can view once they click "View" button)? Or add a number of the facilities that are associated with each Requisition Group and Supply Line?
Let's move this discussion to the Roadmap Ticket OLMIS-2998...
Hi, sorry for late response but I was on the leave.
About the #1 issue: I've added new supply lines using the same supervisory node, supplying facility and program just to show how pagination is working. If we don't want to have such duplicates it should be checked while adding new supply line in a new ticket.
#2 I didn't add the second search endpoint so it is a tech debt.
Okay, thanks. It sounds like captured #2 on the Tech Debt page. For #1, if that was just duplicate data you added to test the screen, then we don't need to worry about changing anything. I think we are all good here. Thanks!