Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

ProcessIdeal ViewNotes
  1. What is happening?
visual / at a glance should illuminate the RISK right away
2. What data is driving that state?Drill-down ability from step above
3. Where should I focus?

Ideas:

  • 3-month view of the 'repeat offenders' 
  • show related indicators at that site

4. How can I improve that? What questions do I ask?

static , suggested RCA questions to ask at the bottom

Vidya Sampath could you clarify this a bit more? I couldn't read you hand writing and want to make sure I'm clear. Perhaps an example or two to provide the RCA probes for each indicator

New: Mary Jo Kochendorfer (Deactivated) - I thought about this after our meeting – but another cool option to have in this dashboard is note-keeping – in that the user is able to jot down the top 2-3 changes that her/his team has decided to implement as a result of data review and analysis from this dashboard. Would it be possible for the dashboard to have a notes section which also gives people ability to put some dates and "@" tags for tasks to other users?



Positive Performance Approach

Vidya Sampath to insert details on what defines 'good performance'.

Star Performers / Soccer League Style idea moving from relegation to premier to back

Separate dashboard for this; super nascent idea stage ; to be updated 

Full stock availability 

Clay Crosby (Unlicensed) and Vidya Sampath I've created this page to track the discussions on how best to visualize the FSA indicator

Important notes about full stock availability :

  • Real value comes in looking at the indicator by facility types (all health facilities or all district stores or all regional stores etc).
ProcessIdeal ViewIdeaNotes
  1. What is happening?
visual / at a glance should illuminate the RISK right away

Idea: Start with a Tree Map View

Groupings for the Tree Map View

  • FSA "Yes" grouping only is yes if all the selected orderables are available during the selected time period at the chosen facility(ies) - label this grouping "Vx Available" in the tree map view.
  • FSA "No" grouping is if any orderable selected is Not Full Stock AvailableFSA No data stocked out during the selected time period at the chosen facility(ies) - label this grouping "Stock-outs" in the tree map view.
  • FSA "No Data" grouping if any orderable selected is No Dataselected does not have data during the selected time period at the chosen facility(ies) - label this grouping "No Data" in the tree map view.

Filter the Tree Map view by

  • Facility type
  • by commodity type (antigen)
  • by time period

Idea:  Perhaps we lead with a bar chart to show which antigens have

There is too much noise if a user selects several antigens and so the bulk of the tree map ends up showing "No" and "No Data" and over-plays the risk as a result. One way to work around this is to display either a simple bar chart which shows antigens with the highest number of sites with FSA = no stockno stock or a bubble plot showing 3 variables (antigen, # of sites, # of days out of stock)


2. What data is driving that state?Drill-down ability from step above

See which sites are When you click on a box in the tree map in Step 1 above, it shows you the data that is contributing to the box. This data can be visualized in the form of a geo-spatial map. Let's say you selected the "No/Stockouts" box in the tree map in Step 1. When you select it, it then shows you a map that highlights the stocked out areas that contributed to the "No" box for the tree map.

Key is to be able to see the 'worst offenders' over time (multiple tree maps potentially)

Every single month (of the selected time period) that facility was a no means they are the biggest concern

by seeing the drill-down for the selected time period, and the visualization for the two previous time periods to pull out patterns of performance. This gives the user the opportunity  in Step 3 below to "Focus" in further.


3. Where should I focus?

Ideas:

  • 3-month view of the 'repeat offenders' A user selects the site from Step 2 above that has long-standing issues
  • show related indicators at that site

When at the site view:

Show the following:

  • CVW
  • SATP
  • See consumption (example below)


4. How can I improve that? What questions do I ask? What corrective actions should we take?

static , suggested RCA questions to ask at the bottom

Vidya Sampath could you clarify this a bit more? I couldn't read you hand writing and want to make sure I'm clear. Perhaps an example or two to provide the RCA probes and action suggestions for each indicator

Static questions for FSA RCA:

  • Is there a link between availability of vaccines and supplies at this site and the parent site(s)?
  • If yes, what can I do about the re-order practices between this site and the parent site? Is the order request calculated accurately? Is the order fulfilled as requested? Were deliveries or pick-ups delayed often?
  • What is the impact of low availability at the national and regional stores on sites lower down the health system?
  • Are certain sites full availability lower (or higher) than expected every time? If yes, what changes can we make to the amount supplied each order? By what percentage should that amount increase (or decrease)?
  • If we disaggregate by location, are rural (or urban) facilities more stocked out than the other? What can we do about that?
  • Is it specific antigens that seem to be stocked out more than others? What's the reason for that - increased consumption? Mass wastage due to CCE failure? Upstream low stock? Global supply shortage?





Other notes, need to organize:
  • FSA of the supplying site for the most problematic facilities (for the same time-period and further back)
  • Pull in other indicators for that site (Stock according to Plan, CVW)
  • Re-order information with use information

Hand written notes

Image RemovedImage Added