Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Sarah Jackson

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Sarah Jackson

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
TopicA. IncrementalB. Rewrite
Time to CompletionSlowerFaster (because of less technical debt to manage, decreased tech risks) , and lack of fast-track support)
Technical Risk  Risks
  • Unclear whether 'slice' approach will work and the degree of untangling that will be required.
  • Lack of written business requirements and user stories for OpenLMIS v1 will require reverse engineering requirements from OpenLMIS software
  • Lack of any consistent staff from first project working on re-write – possibility things may be missed
Incremental ValueValue available with each releaseNone until project matches functionality of OpenLMIS 2.0 (with toggle off feature set)
Technical Quality  Likely higher due to ability to start with a clean slate, particularly in regards to test coverage.
Migration Path  
Scope  
Cost  
New Implementations During ProjectNew implementations can take advantage of incremental releases, have possibility of working with community on needed extension pointsNew implementations before completion will use 2.0 and have to upgrade later.
Community Collaboration  

...