...
- The top progress bar might be confusing to users; maybe a text explanation sentence for users would help.
- Regarding the "All" tab, we suggest an alternative idea: put an "Add" button on the page instead of the two tabs. Clicking the "Add" button brings up a modal/popup with a Product field to pick product(s) to Add, or Cancel to close the modal/popup. When you click add, the modal/popup closes and the table reloads with the additional product(s) shown.
- Regarding the "Lot" dropdown, we suggest doing something visually to distinguish the lot names (Lot A, Lot B, etc) from the Product name (Acetacylic Acid, etc). EG, that could be a slight indent. For the Lot rows we might want to show the Expiration Date, not repeating the Program or Facility column. Nick has an idea that he might share with Mary Jo first. Finally, the Lot expand/collapse could be removed, and we just show all the lots (with no ability to collapse the lots).
- We suggest removing the use of the Pencil icon. All the editable fields can be an editable bubble field. We don't want users to have to make an extra click on a Pencil icon whenever they want to add a number.
- Columns for Program and Facility might not be needed because those are in the page title.
- We suggest grouping these rows by Product Category, or possibly by CommodityType (Josh may have input about how we group by Commodity Types when TradeItems are in multiple CommodityTypes in different classification systems). The Product Category groupings are used on the Requisition Form and help staff to work through their products in a group. Products are alphabetical within each category.
- Regarding the "Back" button, we suggest moving that. We don't have a specific page the user should go 'back' to for now. We don't use the 'back' button as a pattern in OpenLMIS UI so far.
- Regarding the "Save" and "Submit" buttons that are both blue, we suggest moving Save to the left-hand side and making it gray instead of blue (similar to the pattern on the Requisition screen). The "Submit" button is the primary action, so it would stay at the bottom right in Blue color.
- Looking Forward: Once we have built out Adjustment feature (in 3.1 stock scope), we want to add a link to the Adjustment screen from this Physical Inventory screen. While doing the Physical Inventory, a user might want to jump in to make an adjustment for any product, so an action link or action button for that on each product row might be helpful.
...
The SOH summary view within lot information:
Feedback from Team ILL:
- Similar to the feedback above, we can remove the Program and Facility fields and Search button from this screen. These are included in the page title.
- We suggest adding an action button into this SOH summary table to link to making an Adjustment for any row (and product).
- The SOH quantity should sum by all lots into the top row for the whole TradeItem. So if Lot A has 5, Lot B has 10, Lot C has 2, then the trade item row should display quantity 17.
- Looking Forward: Rows that are low on stock would be indicated with color (red) or otherwise. We know the low stock calculation is not in scope for 3.1.
If you click the 'view' button next to one orderable, then it will direct you to the stock card page:
Feedback from Team ILL:
- Bin Card does not need a Facility or a Program column. The Facility and Program will be in the header at the top of the Bin Card.
- We suggest using styles from the Requisition header for the top "BIN CARD" header area. Also, please add some sample content into that header area so we are sure we are understanding what would be on this screen. Also, perhaps the Expiration Date should get a more prominent style since it is important.
Comparison Screens From Other Logistics Systems
...