Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

What is a Lot in v3

...

  • String lotCode (required—if the shipment really does not have a code, and only has an expiration date, then users could paste that date into this code field)
  • Date expirationDate (optional)
  • Date manufactureDate (optional)
  • reference to a TradeItem (required) — this object gives us access to the Manufacturer name, etc, which will be helpful for display. (in V2 this was a reference to a product)
  • boolean active flag — potentially a future feature to be able to set a Lot as inactive after it has gone out of circulation; or maybe this is connected to how you archive the lot instead of a DELETE endpoint
  • UUID will get assigned to the Lot in ReferenceData, but it won't be visible to the user

...

  1. Josh, are there any other GS1 fields or naming changes needed?
  2. Is it clear enough how to tell that a TradeItem has no Lots (meaning Stock Service should create stock cards by the trade item, not by Lots)?
    1. Would this be a 404 NOT FOUND from GET /api/lots?tradeItemID=1234&active=true or a 200 with empty response object {}?
  3. If a TradeItem has no Lots, then has StockCards with inventory and adjustments with no Lots, then later on the TradeItem has lots, how does that impact the Stock service?
    1. Proposed solution: For any TradeItem, allow the simultaneous existence of stock cards that have Lots along with stock cards that do not have Lots. We simply need our software to be flexible since Lots might get introduced into the supply chain at different times or in different locations, even after some stock cards and physical inventories exist in the software.
  4. If a TradeItem has Lots and Stock service has inventories and adjustments associated with it, and then all Lots become inactive with no new Lots added, how does that impact the Stock service?
    1. Proposed solution: same as above.
  5. Does Stock Management need an "adjustment" reason to move stock from one lot to another, in cases where it was inaccurate reported? Or in cases where it was previously inventoried with no Lot information but now we want to start tracking it by Lots?
    1. Proposed solution: For now we assume users might need to do this manually (pick some existing adjustment reason to reduce Lot A by 100 and increase Lot B by 100; or reduce count without a Lot by 100 and increase count in Lot C by 100).