...
Discussion on Visualizations
Status as of
Will we be able to display Months of Stock (MOS)? Clay Crosby (Unlicensed)'s repsones. We won't have MOS for the week of but we can aim to have it in for GAVI.
Vidya Sampath and Mary Jo Kochendorfer (Deactivated) please take a look at the new Stock Monitoring dashboard: https://superset.ona.io/superset/dashboard/26/?preselect_filters=%7B%22224%22%3A%7B%22__from%22%3A%22%22%7D%7D
and CVW dashboard: https://superset.ona.io/superset/dashboard/24/?preselect_filters=%7B%7D
Tree map information: starting at the district level so you can show how you can drill into them, although for this initial round of demos obv we will just have data for cuamba (plus the little bit we havein there currently for lichinga)
Geographic Maps: one to show FSA by district, and one to show submissions. currently the map we have is province-levle but our team should be replacing that early next week. if you want to build another map viz, it;'s really easy. create a new slice and configure it like this, the only difference would be changing the metric. when our team creates the new map file, the "ISO 3166..." field should be "district", not "region code" (as we will be creating a district-level geojson)
Full Stock Availability:
- that goes from district -> facility -> commodity type. it excludes CTs where FSA = 0, but that would mean the soh for that CT = 0 for thelast year, which i dont think would happen in the real world
- FSA - yes - this does not group by CT, per vidya's instructions that "ALL" orderables have FSA=100 to appear. So, there is no data for this chart currently due to the sparse demo data we have on hand. I expect this to change after craig and the team load data for the cuamba district
- FSA - No - this does not group by CT for the same reasons as 2), and for the same reason as 1) (that things with FSA =0 are excluded), this chart is null. again, forthe same reasons as 1), i don't think this would happen in the real world and i expect it to be improved inthe demo data
if the fact that facilities where FSA = 0 for all CTs across the reporting period are excluded is an issue, we would really just want to report on facilitieswhere soh = 0, which can be done, but that's not how i'm interpreting the ask