Sprint 25 is a shorter and we will release 3.0.2 on 08 May 2017 prior to the end of the release. We will release during this sprint so we will need to be mindful of what we can complete in time for a 3.0.2 patch. Note that we are still working towards 3.0.2. 

Reference UI

We're working toward openlmis-reference-ui 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
Here's a list of all repositories and which version are being worked on:

• openlmis-auth-ui - 5.0.0, next version: 5.0.1
• openlmis-fulfillment-ui - 5.0.0, next version: 5.0.1
• openlmis-referencedata-ui - 5.0.0, next version: 5.1.0
• openlmis-report-ui - 5.0.0, next version: 5.0.1
• openlmis-requisition-ui - 5.0.0, next version: 5.0.1
• openlmis-ui-components - 4.0.1, next version: 4.0.2
• openlmis-ui-layout - 5.0.0, next version: 5.0.1

The major version bump was due to adding main state which resulted in all the states being modified

Bugs

Blockers

Critical

• 
• 
• 
• 
• - just to clarify, we do not want to allow any duplicates, right?
• 

Major

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
  
  
•  (we were not able to see this behvior, needs to be reopened) MUST
•  MUST
• 
  
  

Requisition

Will be working towards 3.1.3-SNAPSHOT. Because requisition-3.1.2 is planned to be released end of April in ref-distro-3.0.2.

•  MUST (request from Malawi) Q: there is a ticket for an endpoint searching users, but can requisitions figure out the warehouses? I think might have to copy the logic from fulfillment here.
•  MUST

Reference Data

Will be working towards 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT. Because referencedata-5.0.0 is planned to be released end of April in ref-distro-3.0.2. Improvements such as 2357 make this a Minor bump to 5.1.0, not a patch 5.0.1.

• - MUST (blocks OLMIS-2322)
•  MUST (SPLIT out OLMIS-2413 for TeamILL)
•  - MUST Q: Second mockup - fields are arranged in a strange way (non-style guide). Is this intentional? Q2: OLMIS-1696 changes the orderable structure. It seems this ticket does not take that into account? After the refactor, orderables do not have types, commodity types and trade items have a field with multiple orderables instead.
•  - MUST
•  - MUST Q: what about the password reset mentioned in the comments by Chongsun Ahn (Unlicensed)?

Platform

• 
• Next on Ad-hoc Reporting (TeamILL)

Stretch:

• Improve workflow so that fixing bugs results in a new automated test
•  (Josh Zamor I put this here for you to consider; it got pulled from 3.0.2/sprint 24. Is it a priority for May (maybe while you're in Poland?)? -Brandon
• (might need spike)

Team ILL

• 

• If program data PoC should proceed:

  • 
  • 

• Wait to identify next tickets from