The Release Candidate Test Plan

When all 3.13 tickets have been completed, we can begin testing, and we will follow the test plan detailed below.

Before we start the Release Candidate testing:

Starting the Release Candidate testing:


Test Phase

Components/Features

Assigned in Test Cycle

Dates

QA lead responsibilities

RC 1

  • Execution of the 3.13 RC1 test cases on Firefox (Regression testing concerning all components/features);

  • Performance testing on Chrome;

  • Exploratory and translation testing on Chrome.

3.13 RC1

5 full days (as needed)

Team Mind the Parrot: 

  • Szymon Rujner

     will provide the status of testing by the end of the day; 

  • Szymon Rujner

     will triage and prioritize any bugs found during RC testing;

  • If there are blocker or critical bugs, they will be assigned to a 3.13RC1Bug test cycle;

  • Bugs are labeled 3.13RC1bug.

Bug triage

Bug triage for RC1

Bug fixes test cycle for a given Release Candidate, e.g. 3.13 RC1 Bug fixes

3 full days (as needed)

Suggested schedule, assuming we start testing on March 17:

Week One:

Mon March 14

Tue March 15

Wed March 16

Thu March 17

Fri March 18


  • Deploy 3.13 RC

  • Start testing

    Testing is focused on regression testing (i.e. manual test case execution) and performance testing. Exploratory and translation testing is performed in the meantime, i.e. during the wait for the bug fixes or when someone doesn’t have any other testing to perform. Exploratory and translation testing has to be done instead of the code freeze tasks.



Week Two:

Mon March 21

Tue March 22

Wed March 23

Thu March 24

Fri March 25

  • Daily bug triage at 3PM CEST

  • Daily bug triage at 3PM CEST

  • Daily bug triage at 3PM CEST

Week Three:

Mon March 28

Tue March 29

Wed March 30

Thu March 31

Fri Apr 01

  • Daily bug triage at 3PM CEST

  • Daily bug triage at 3PM CEST

  • The 3.13 Release

Week Four:

Mon Apr 04

Tue Apr 05

Wed Apr 06

Thu Apr 07

Fri Apr 08




Roles & Responsibilities

QA Team Leads

Szymon Rujner will be the QA lead for the Mind the Parrot team.

Owner

Responsibilities

Questions/Tasks before release begins

Szymon Rujner

  • Create test cycles;

  • Create missing test cases and assign them to test cycles;

  • Point person for any questions about test cases from the team;

  • Review execution of the test cycles, there should be progress during the day, and communicate the status at the end of the day;

  • Triage bugs before the scheduled bug triage;

  • Prioritize bugs per test cycle, check that developers have detailed proposed solutions (if time or the developer's experience allows). When a bug is created during the day, the bugs are triaged before the end of the day and detailed in the daily QA Slack communication;

  • Report the status of each test cycle, including defects reported, before the end of day; 

  • After a bug fix test cycle, review automated testing and provide its status before the end of the day (go to http://build.openlmis.org/view/all/builds).


Team leads:



  • Attend and make a decision for Go/No-Go before we start the release process:

    • Agree all features are done and ready to be tested;

    • The team is ready to start testing;

    • Review roles & responsibilities.

  • Coordinate manual testing with team members;

  • Coordinate manual performance testing with team members;

  • Assign bugs to developers after they have been prioritized at the bug triage;

  • Refresh test environments as needed (see the instructions here: /wiki/spaces/OP/pages/112106340).

  • Team Mind the Parrot focuses on manual performance testing;

  • Team Mind the Parrot typically refreshes all test environments during the release testing.

Team responsibilities

  • Execute the test cases assigned to you;

  • Record the test execution by following these steps: Testing Process & Test Plans#ExecutingTestCase;

  • Enter bugs as encountered:

    • If there are any blocker bugs, try to spend some time completing a root cause analysis and add the details in the bug ticket for ease at the bug triage;

    • When a bug is found, research and provide proposals in the ticket for review by Szymon Rujner  (as time allows);

    • Check the bugs for completeness, proposed solutions, priorities and labels;

    • All bugs are labeled with their release candidate: RC1, RC2, etc.

  • Assist other testers as needed.

  • Szymon Rujner

     will create a bug test cycle when bugs are found, and assign the test cases to them. For each RC, there will be a separate bug fix test cycle.


The Bug Triage team

Members

Responsibilities

Questions

Szymon Rujner

Wesley Brown

Nikola Laskowska

Dominika Bieńkowska (Deactivated)

Hubert (Deactivated)

Trevor Lambiotte
David Crewe-Brown

  • Review the list of bugs provided on the QA Slack channel;

    • Only bugs that have been entered and labeled RC1bug will be reviewed during the triage;

  • Prioritize bugs; 

  • Communicate which bugs need to be fixed;

  • Szymon Rujner

     to create test cycles for retesting if needed;

  • Szymon Rujner

     to provide the status update on the bug fixes on the QA Slack channel as needed;

  • Szymon Rujner

     to communicate on Slack the bugs that have been added to the board for the day.

  • When should we meet every day? Meetings will be held every two days (6am PST) and a communication on the bug triage status at the end of the day;

  • Guidance on bug prioritization is located here: http://docs.openlmis.org/en/latest/contribute/contributionGuide.html#reporting-bugs;

  • If there are bugs, then testing for the RC will be done in UAT only;

  • If there are critical/blocker bugs found, then we must retest. If the bugs concern the Reference Data service, all test cases related to the RC in which the bug was found have to be executed again. If the bug concerns any other service, only test cases concerning the service in which it was found have to be executed again;

  • Communication of the test plan before we start testing for the release:

    • Szymon Rujner

       is responsible for communicating this test plan on the QA Slack channel.

Communication on the Test Plan and the daily testing status:

Environments and the demo data for testing

Environments: uat.openlmis.org.

Refer to the demo data readme for more details about user permissions: https://github.com/OpenLMIS/openlmis-referencedata/blob/master/src/main/resources/db/demo-data/README.md .

ONLY test with the users "admin" or "administrator" when executing test cases related to administrative activities.

Test Data

Component

Username

Program

Concerns

Requisition



srmanager1, smanager1, psupervisor, wclerk1




srmanager2, smanager2, psupervisor, wclerk1 


srmanager4 (for the second approval), smanager4, dsrmanager, psupervisor


chaz (for the second approval)


administrator (testing requisition template updates/changes or program settings changes)

Family Planning

Essential Meds

ARV


Essential Meds and Family Planning




ARV


Family Planning

Essential Meds

EPI

ARV

  • Demo data restriction: May need to refresh the environment if all current requisition periods are processed (request and post the status on the QA Slack channel).

Stock Management

srmanager2


divo1, rivo

Family Planning, Essential Meds


EPI


Fulfillment

vsrmanager1

vsrmanager2

divo1

divo2

rivo

vwclerk1

wclerk1

EPI






ARV


Administration (Reference Data)

admin

administrator

All programs


CCE

divo1

divo2

vsrmanager1 (supervises Cuamba)

vsrmanager2 (one facility)

EPI


Reporting

administrator

All programs


Exploratory Tests

More details concerning this kind of testing can be found in the section on exploratory testing in the Testing Guide: https://openlmis.readthedocs.io/en/latest/conventions/testing.html#exploratory-testing.

Performance Tests

The performance testing scenarios are located here: Performance Metrics.

Enter the performance metrics here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1z1D4EUHsE-R_bUTt4HYcWiVDEy_UX50lZhdiyiC4bYg/edit#gid=0 .


Deploying the release: Release Checklist 3.4.