/
Backlog Grooming Sprint 17

Backlog Grooming Sprint 17

Jan 09, 2017

Themes:

  • Requisitions - keep moving forward with new columns
  • Fulfillment - APIs to support the 'view orders' and 'manage POD' screens
  • Reference data - errors and enforcing rights
  • UI - see the UI section


Rollover Team ILL

Requisitions (template and improvements)

Bugs

Tickets

  • OLMIS-924 - Getting issue details... STATUS Question about the formula - why n-1? Answer: addressed, should be n.
  • OLMIS-887 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • OLMIS-218 - Getting issue details... STATUS Confirmation wanted: When skipping a requisition it does not participate in the calculations for next requisitions (eg. beginning balance)
  • OLMIS-839 - Getting issue details... STATUS Would an endpoint on the backend that retrieves n last requisitions for the given facility, program and schedule make sense? We currently do not have one and it would simplify and speed up UI a lot
  • OLMIS-1134 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • OLMIS-1063 - Getting issue details... STATUS  (ILL)
  • OLMIS-1413 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • OLMIS-1503 - Getting issue details... STATUS  Needs clean up (blocks 1501/2)


Potentially

  • Need to add Ticket for capturing dates at each state change → to be displayed on View Requisitions, "approve" and convert to order screens.

Fulfillment

  • OLMIS-1555 - Getting issue details... STATUS  Chongsun Ahn (Unlicensed) will fill out.
  • OLMIS-1518 - Getting issue details... STATUS Should we check for status here? Eg. the new endpoint won't work for the already transferred orders
  • OLMIS-1371 - Getting issue details... STATUS  (blocked by  OLMIS-1512 - Getting issue details... STATUS )
  • Any other tickets to support 'view orders screen'

UI


  • New functionality tickets
    • New columns
    • View/Calculate Total Requisition Cost
    • Comments
    • Product skipping and adding back previously skipped products
    • Vew orders
  • Tech Debt
    • Clean up translation strings. Let's define the end game for this for 3.0  OLMIS-1252 - Getting issue details... STATUS
    • Button styleguide
    • Sentence documentation (lowest priority and can be moved to next sprint) – Documentation should be written in 30 minutes this sprint

ILL work will be roll over:

OLMIS-1072 - Getting issue details... STATUS   OLMIS-1514 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Bugs

Ticket (in priority order)

  • OLMIS-1451 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • OLMIS-1525 - Getting issue details... STATUS  (sub-task for Average Consumption)
  • OLMIS-1544 - Getting issue details... STATUS



  • OLMIS-1084 - Getting issue details... STATUS  (blocked by  OLMIS-1387 - Getting issue details... STATUS )
  • OLMIS-1549 - Getting issue details... STATUS  (if the APIs are ready)

Stretch/Sprint 18

Reference Data

  • OLMIS-1398 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • OLMIS-1455 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • OLMIS-1556 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • OLMIS-1557 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • OLMIS-1558 - Getting issue details... STATUS Isn't this done? Also why should we enforce MANAGE_ROLES on rights endpoint?
  • OLMIS-1563 - Getting issue details... STATUS  (Team ILL)
  • OLMIS-1564 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Reference Data Stretch Goal: 

  • OLMIS-1444 - Getting issue details... STATUS  (for Team ILL; pending Jake input)

Platform

  • OLMIS-1559 - Getting issue details... STATUS (ILL)
  • OLMIS-1333 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • OLMIS-1449 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • OLMIS-1504 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • OLMIS-969 - Getting issue details... STATUS The ticket says no classes with ANY dependencies should be moved to shared library. How about classes with Jackson annotations? Eg. some DTOs
  • Add ticket to capture BI&A calls and effort to finalize the Product Model

Stretch goal (based on TOP/AYIC retrospective):

OLMIS-1606 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Stock Management

QA

  • OLMIS-1014 - Getting issue details... STATUS Should creating a new user always require an e-mail? Should it be possible for an administrator to set user's password?
  • OLMIS-1409 - Getting issue details... STATUS

OpenLMIS: the global initiative for powerful LMIS software