2017-10-17 Meeting notes
Date
Oct 17, 2017
7am PST / 4pm CEST
Meeting Link
Toll: +1-415-655-0001
Number: 199 948 686
Attendees
@Chongsun Ahn (Unlicensed)
@Josh Zamor (Deactivated)
@Paweł Gesek
@Mateusz Kwiatkowski
@Nick Reid (Deactivated)
@Nikodem Graczewski (Unlicensed)
@Paweł Albecki (Deactivated)
@Sebastian Brudziński
Goals
Concurrency Update
Discuss UI architecture short & long term changes
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
5m | Review agenda and discussion items | @Nick Reid (Deactivated) |
|
15m | Concurrency Update | @Sebastian Brudziński |
|
10m | UI Long term vision | @Nick Reid (Deactivated) |
|
10m | UI Architecture | @Nick Reid (Deactivated) |
|
5m | JSON Resource Representations | @Chongsun Ahn (Unlicensed) |
|
Notes
Concurrency Update
Add a new field into status changes - add previous status change - chaining essentially
Status changes would link to a status comment
Add unique constraint to reasons in requisition adjustments
UI change would be needed as it allows a user to add multiple reasons for a single item
When do we need these changes? For 3.2.1
Questions:
Why do we have a different table in requisition adjustments, rather than using stock management?
We only create Stock Events when a requisition is approved
Requisition is released at final approval
Note: Should check requirements for stock management adjustment reasons (such as physical inventory)
UI Long-term Vision
Remove AngularJS
Self-contain business logic - using Pure Javascript Objects (POJOs)
Formalize UI Architecture
ES6
Will help writing POJOs without Angular dependency injection
Webpack
Code bundling and faster load times
Run-time environment
Keep configuration variables.... configurable
"True Mobile"
Not necessarily native, but works on tablet
Can use camera/barcode/etc
How to deal with different requirements and documenting/maintaining these changes
Need to be able to test "Happy Path" across different devices
We want feature sets across systems to be "more alike" than not
Guidance on "high level" design and architecture
Do we talk about whole application or just single workflows when building experience
Maintenance considerations: easier to develop many user-persona focused "apps" or one mega app that understands our RBAC?
frequency of updates to the app
Size of app
people with multiple hats needing more than one app on their device
cross-device usage / IT burden for loading apps - in the end is an IT shop just going to update a bundle of apps at the same frequency as one mega app?
Performance considerations
Would a mega-app need to cache more meta data?
Do most people wear multiple hats and so the device would need to download and cache all meta-data similarly to how a mega-app might work
UI Architecture
Directives/components add affordance to semantic base
Resources that return domain objects
"Thin" state configuration
JSON Resource Representations
Generally we return "expanded" in many places
Returning "expanded" sections causes performance values
"Expanded" endpoints might be caused by referencedata being "locked-down"
Need to allow referencedata to be cache-able
Devs should ask community how to avoid expanded definitions, when they notice they are doing it
Want to focus on "essential" and "expanded"
HREF property is from HL7 FHIR
Action Items