2018-05-17 Meeting notes - Stock Reason Tagging & Stock Based Requisitions

• Based on meeting with Mary Jo
• Some insights in the comment, here: 2018-05-15 Meeting notes
• don't enforce business logic on which tags may be assigned to which reasons - that's categorization
• don't require that a reason have a tag - again categorization
• I don't think we need system and user tags - sounds again like categorization but I might misunderstand.

Which requisition template columns should expose tags?

Should total loss/adj use all other "unaccounted" reasons, or should it be by tags as well?

Tag everything!

• Sebastian Brudziński to update tickets

API design for retrieval of Stock data (if not covered by reviews yet)

• do we need additional grouping by reasons? (eg. for total losses/adjustments modal in requisitions)

proposed response, review, 

Requisition Line Item, new endpoint definition

• Josh Zamor (Deactivated) to talk with Mary Jo Kochendorfer (Deactivated) about the need to split by reasons on total losses and adjustments for SBR

• Add tags to bootstrap stock reasons
• Sebastian Brudziński to update the ticket to reflect this

Validations for tags - are they required, and if so, where?

• Should every stock reason have at least one tag?
• Should every SBR column that supports tag have one assigned?

• We shouldn't enforce tags on Stock reasons
• We should validate that the columns have tags

• Sebastian Brudziński to see whether you can edit category/type for Stock Reasons via API and if so, create tech debt ticket to fix this
• Sebastian Brudziński update the ticket that introduces tags to requisitions to mention validations