Spike on Contract Tests using demo data

Description

As a developer, I want to write contract tests to test my business scenarios and that specific Services are honoring their API contracts. Contract Tests have their own "demo data" which is separate from the service's demo data. Do we need to maintain a separate set of demo data just for contract tests?

Acceptance:

look into usage of demo data in contract tests and answer: is there anything here that's needed for contract testing that a service's demo data couldn't be used for?
write-up short wiki recommendation
schedule short meeting to make a decision: leave it as is, or potentially use service's demo data for contract testing. This should include a stakeholder in QA & BA so they can weigh in on potentially dual purposed demo data.

Linked work items

blocks

OLMIS-2193

Fill testing gap for changing the approved quantity in in_approval state

relates to

OLMIS-2883

Performance Testing Data - Generate, Load, Manage

OLMIS-2813

Performance Improvement Guidance

Confluence content

mentioned on

QAlity Plus - Test Management

Checklists

Activity

Josh Zamor

August 2, 2017 at 12:39 AM

Thanks!

Josh Zamor

August 2, 2017 at 12:39 AM

I left my comments in the wiki page. I believe this is good to go and the ticket can be closed.

Brandon Bowersox-Johnson

August 1, 2017 at 10:13 PM

@Josh Zamor we need you to weigh in on this question from @Paweł Gesek. Have we achieved the Acceptance Criteria so we can close this ticket and plan new work in a future ticket? AND would this be a helpful topic at Technical Committee next week?

Paweł Gesek

August 1, 2017 at 4:10 PM

@Brandon Bowersox-Johnson @Josh Zamor can we perhaps close this ticket and create a new one for implementing the approach? If the performance test data approach won't change the general concept, I think perhaps we can leave that part for a different ticket or leave some parts blank in the new ticket.

Paweł Gesek

July 21, 2017 at 11:54 AM

(edited)

@Brandon Bowersox-Johnson the next step is for @Josh Zamor to add his thoughts to the page, specifically having performance test data in consideration.

Resize work item view side panel

Done

Pinned fields

Click on the next to a field label to start pinning.

Details

Assignee

Paweł Gesek

Reporter

Josh Zamor(Deactivated)

Story Points

Original estimate

Time tracking

5h logged2d 3h remaining

Components

Architecture

Sprint

Add sprint

Fix versions

3.2

Priority

Minor

Time Assistant

Created June 1, 2017 at 3:45 PM

Updated August 2, 2017 at 8:52 PM

Resolved August 2, 2017 at 8:13 AM