Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TopicNotes/Presentation
Review of the MVP process and objectives for the breakout sessions by domainSee the following notes on the discussions which took place.
      • Stock Management

Attendees: Ryan McWhorter (UNICEF), Dorthe Konradsen (UNICEF), Teresa Ha (UNICEF),

Facilitator: Brandon Bowersox-Johnson (VillageReach)

Key Activities discussed

  • Dependencies & Configuration
  • Enter stock data
  • View stock data
  • Alerts and notifications
  • Barcodes
  • Questions
      • Forecasting

Attendees: Ashra Islam (JSI), Gemma Orta-Martinez (UNICEF), Jorgen Kofoed (UNICEF), Alpha Omari (JSI)

Facilitator: Chris Wright (JSI)

The group discussed a wide range of user stories, key activities, and scenarios. The following is a brief summary of the two day discussion.

Key Take aways:

Annual national forecast needs to be entered into OpenLMIS rather than building in the various forecasting logic required, especially because there are different methodologies and sometimes mixed methods for determining forecast. But some information must also be included as text to capture the methodology used, the assumptions, and any constraints that affected the final quantity forecasted (e.g. budget limits or storage capacity). Forecast should be the true "constrained forecast" on which supply plans and forecast accuracy are based. OpenLMIS should enable upload of forecast for all levels if the program follows the traditional WHO methodology.

  • If the annual forecast is used for allocation/push resupply to lower levels (the traditional WHO methodology), this process can be used for either routine or campaigns, since the target-based methodology is the same. However, campaigns are otherwise out of scope for MVP

If the annual forecast is used to determine resupply throughout each tier of the supply chain using an allocation/push system, then pipeline views (future stock position based on forecast, current SOH, AMC, and planned resupply) are MVP must haves at each level in order to predict potential stock imbalances that risk stock out or expiry due to overstock anywhere within the system. This will inform resupply decisions (timing and quantities).

If lower levels requisition, MVP functionality should provide each user a suggested resupply quantity based on: Max - (closing) SOH = qty to order. This is simple and takes into account any losses/adjustments due to transfers, expiry, damage, etc. However, this will work only if the MVP Max stock level is a dynamic figure (configuration) shown as months of stock (MOS) or weeks of stock (WOS), in which:

  • MOS = AMC (over most recent # months) X resupply period (e.g. 3 months) + # weeks safety stock (should include buffer for fluctuations in demand and lead-time stock consumed between order and receipt).
      • Cold Chain Equipment (CCE)

Attendees: Mitesh (NexLeaf), Michelle (UNICEF), Matt (PATH), (Josh (VillageReach) for part of the day)

Facilitator: Rachel Powers (Deactivated) (VillageReach)

The group focused on the key activities:

  • Create CCE catalog
  • Add/View CCE inventory (specific CCE devices per facility)
  • Capture Temperature & Functionality status
  • Remote Temperature Monitoring (RTM)
  • Alarms & Notifications
  • Available Storage Capacity
  • Repair & Maintenance

      • Re-supply

Attendees: Amy Roberts (CHAI), Justin, Fesha, Kaleb Brownlow (Gates Foundation)

Facilitator: Vidya Sampath (VillageReach)

The group focused on the key activities:

  • View critical information (prioritized list of elements in orange)
  • Review SOH or Requested Quantities of the facility(ies) to resupply
  • Set the 'fill'/'resupply' quantities
  • (potentially) Print a pick pack list
  • Confirm shipment amounts
  • Generate a ePOD
  • Notify the destination
  • Receive stock (into the destination storeroom/fridge)
  • Reject stock

VillageReach reviewed the activities and stories within each domain. An initial line of the MVP was drawn.

...