Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Ubiquitous language – same language for developers and domain experts. We have different meanings for technical words (e.g. order line item) than client can have.
  • Bounded Context – boundaries.
    • Orderable
      • Do we need whole object or just code in different services?
      • Orderable can change and we need/use its properties in requisition.
      • If all orderable information need to be in snapshot? Other approach is versioning of orderables.
    • Requisition
      • During approve we need only two fields from line items. We validate every field even we don't use it.
      • Separate resource for requisition for approval?
      • Immutable orderables as a way to make requisition proper Aggregate.
    • Do we have bounded contexts in OpenLMIS?
      • Are microservices give us proper bounded context?  We believe they will after few adjustments.
      • Orderable is everywhere.
      • Is Referencedata shared kernel? We can say so.
      • Can we extract bounded context somewhere:?
        • Divide Requisition.
    • Report, Management, Auth contexts.
    • User is used everywhere. Only display name should be in shared kernelbetween services.
    • Every service should have own abstraction e.g. cce CCE should not be impacted if Referencedata user is changed.
    • Importer/Exporter pattern can be helpful with abstraction.
    • Dtos are abstraction itself. Should be in shared library so every dependent service doesn't have to be updated after dto will change.
  • Problem domain in OpenLMIS – medical products management.
  • Core domain in OpenLMIS
    • who Who is customer? Ministry of Health or any Organization that want to implement OpenLMIS.
    • Requisition is core domain.
  • Sub-domains
    • Stock management
    • CCE

...

  • Requisition as an aggregate, to manage line items we should use only requisition class and snapshot orderables.
  • "Talking" with client on material was not necessary.
  • We should follow up with DDD in more practical way.

Action items