| Indicator | Expected Difference | Explanation | Validation Approach for Future Tests | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Units Reporting | unknown | vrMIS always counted a HU as reporting if the HU was visited (regardless of whether data was entered) SELV only counts a HU as reporting if certain business rules are met: Report Definition: Health Units (HU) Reporting (e.g. If a HU was visited, it reported at least EPI data. A visited HU will always be counted as reporting.) #HU Reported should always be greater than or equal to #HU visited. How does vrMIS determine if a non-visited HU reported? | Look at underlying data in Tableau and confirm that any data discrepancies are due to | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tetanus Used | SELV will be higher than vrMIS | vrMIS wasn't calculating this correctly. It should be the sum of all 1st and 2-5 doses administered to all groups of women. | Verify one health center manually | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PCV Supplies Delivered | SELV will be less than vrMIS | vrMIS had mistaken information on vial size (10 doses per vial instead of 2 doses per vial) PCV Vial Size Info: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/90378/1/WHO_IVB_13.09_eng.pdf | vrMIS PCV Supplies Delivered / 10 * 2 = SELV PCV Supplies Delivered | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Child Coverage | SELV will be higher than vrMIS | vrMIS was erronously including cases where no coverage data was reported in the overall coverage rate calculation. When no coverage data was reported, the target group number was still included in the overage coverage rate calculation. For example, if there are three HUs (note the row in pink is the source of the error):
| Hand calculate correct coverage rate in excel and compare to Argentina's data |
General
Content
Integrations