Vaccine MVP

Target release	3.3
Document status	DRAFT
Document owner	Mary Jo Kochendorfer (Deactivated)
Technical Lead	Josh Zamor

Goals/Scope

Functionality to support the management of the vaccine (EPI) program within OpenLMIS
Due to the complex nature of vaccine programs, we have a unique set of User Personas for the vaccine user stories

Initial analysis of the following systems to understand the current systems in place supporting the management of vaccines.

Features were prioritized due to constraints in funding. Features which did not make the initial Minimal Viable Product are not considered unimportant but will be scheduled and prioritized when more funding or resources are identified.
Target a November 2017 release
Initial stock management features have already been completed
Centralized lot management is completed

The following pages describe the scope within each of the key domains.

The following table displays the estimated release dates for the various key user activities which are assigned to a domain.

Description	Link

Below is a list of questions to be addressed as a result of this requirements document:

#	Question	Outcome	Status
1	Calculation of reorder/allocation amounts for routine resupply MOS, CCE capacity, buffer, average consumption, FEFO Bundling of orders (diluents and vaccines)
2	Program data capture During requisitioning? Allocation? Delivery?
3	Closed/open vial discarded/wastage. Should open vial wastage be included in the initial set of features?
4	Requisition updates/changes to meet vaccine needs. We need to evaluate what changes need to happen to the requisition service to support vaccines. This was not discussed at the vaccine workshop.
5	Lot management system requirements (do we require a lot selection? How? Do we allow for decentralized additions of new lots?)
6	Location of stock. Do we spend resources to build out GLN concept and increase the complexity of the facility concept
7	End to end mapping/view of the workflows and data.
8	Kits were not prioritized by stakeholders. How important is it to have support for kits when implementers are assessing electronic LMIS?