2018-07-12 Meeting notes - UX Maturity & Process
Date
Jul 12, 2018
Attendees
@Josh Zamor (Deactivated)
@Mary Jo Kochendorfer (Deactivated)
@Nikodem Graczewski (Unlicensed)
Goals
How to track which UX user's have been trained on - and which are dificult to move forward
Improve process / communication
Discussion items
Which UX
We think that a list, maintained in the Essential Toolbox for developers, is the right approach for now to keep track of which UX user's have been trained on and therefore is the UX which we can't change without a careful process.
The items that'd go in that list are:
High user sensitivity
Requisition
Table forms (tables that are wholly a part of a form) - needs a semantic term
Tag component
Datepicker component
View Orders screen
Medium user sensitivity
Administration
We also identified that some terms need a lot of explanation and aren't standardized across developers, much less product and developers. We need semantic (i.e. terms with meaning to the user/business) terms for these UI/UX pieces. For example on table forms we could define forms such as:
List form or Search Results form
Detail Form or Line Item Form
Process
When discussing our process and our communication, we agreed to iterate on the current process.
We felt that this is good:
Continue to discuss and brainstorm on the dev forum
We wanted to add:
We should distinguish in the conversation when we're brainstorming vs. when we're making decisions.
Further when we're making decisions, we should qualify any time pressure from that decision or if there's a blocker involved.
@Josh Zamor (Deactivated) @Mary Jo Kochendorfer (Deactivated) I tried to find the mock-ups Nick has shown us during the SolDevelo visit in Seattle and I succeeded. Should we use those names when describing parts of the UI?
https://openlmis.mybalsamiq.com/projects/olmis-3609genericworkflows/grid - this might be non-public doc.