Goals: Continue building new features in Stock Management and Cold Chain Equipment. Major bugs. Performance. New UI component.
CCE
Paweł Gesek Could you review the scope for A. Manage CCE Catalog and B. Manage CCE Inventory and let me know if you think it is better for the team to focus on one epic (Catalog) before moving to the next (Inventory). Or should we first create both domain models?
- - OLMIS-2609Getting issue details... STATUS (MUST)
- - OLMIS-2604Getting issue details... STATUS (MUST) - UI was split into separate tickets
Nice to have
- - OLMIS-2618Getting issue details... STATUS (if we don't want to start on the inventory we could continue to build out catalog tickets)
Q: Paweł Gesek ILL would like to try making showcase videos for the above CCE tickets (OLMIS-2609 & 2618) – please comment if you agree.
Stock Management
- Finish all parts of - OLMIS-2711Getting issue details... STATUS (in current sprint but has lots of sub-tasks)
- Brandon Bowersox-Johnson to work on next tickets for connecting Req and SM based on Connecting Stock Management and Requisition Services - Team ILL
- - OLMIS-2741Getting issue details... STATUS
- - OLMIS-2737Getting issue details... STATUS
- - OLMIS-2790Getting issue details... STATUS (needs investigation)
- Bug to Fix RAML (found by Team Parrot)
Q: Maybe do a showcase video on OLMIS-2711 once it is finished.
Requisition
- - OLMIS-2800Getting issue details... STATUS
- - OLMIS-2801Getting issue details... STATUS
- - OLMIS-2715Getting issue details... STATUS
- - OLMIS-2747Getting issue details... STATUS
- - OLMIS-2517Getting issue details... STATUS
- - OLMIS-2797Getting issue details... STATUS (ILL)
- - OLMIS-2796Getting issue details... STATUS
-
-
OLMIS-2799Getting issue details...
STATUS
Fulfillment
- - OLMIS-2795Getting issue details... STATUS (MUST)
- - OLMIS-2724Getting issue details... STATUS
- - OLMIS-2726Getting issue details... STATUS
-
-
OLMIS-2781Getting issue details...
STATUS
- (based on discussion in PR #4 — Paweł Gesek has reviewed the issues there and has a suggestion for how we move forward: his suggestion is to remove the GET /api/orders endpoint entirely. This "get all orders" endpoint is not used by the UI or anyone as far as we know. Instead everyone will use the /api/orders/search endpoint to find a specific set of orders returning a list of order UUIDs. Pawel also believes the GET /api/orders is not in v2, it was only created in v3 but never used. Josh Zamor do you agree?
- Paweł Gesek, please see latests guidance in OLMIS-2781
Reference UI
- - OLMIS-2655Getting issue details... STATUS Q: Should we add this to an existing screen? If yes, which one?
- - OLMIS-2661Getting issue details... STATUS (Team ILL)
- - OLMIS-2146Getting issue details... STATUS (Team ILL)
- - OLMIS-2814Getting issue details... STATUS (Team ILL)
- - OLMIS-2030Getting issue details... STATUS (Team ILL)
- - OLMIS-2316Getting issue details... STATUS (TeamILL)
- - OLMIS-2798Getting issue details... STATUS
- - OLMIS-2738Getting issue details... STATUS (needs to be reproduced)
- - OLMIS-2714Getting issue details... STATUS (Needs to be reproduced — also needs review to see if general bug and 'global' approach can be taken)
- - OLMIS-2805Getting issue details... STATUS
-
-
OLMIS-2803Getting issue details...
STATUS
- The remaining work here is centering the modal (and actually all modals)
- There is a discussion about how center we want these modals to be (generally off center looks right)
- Ideally the modals would adjust based on the screen height
Reference Data
- OLMIS-2716Getting issue details... STATUS (Need additional feedback in comments from Josh Zamor before working on this.)
-
-
OLMIS-2787Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Paweł Gesek does it make sense for Lucyna Laska (Unlicensed) to do this before she leaves? Would other devs use this?
- - OLMIS-2811Getting issue details... STATUS
Reports
Platform
- - OLMIS-2812Getting issue details... STATUS - (ILL) Josh
- - OLMIS-2813Getting issue details... STATUS - (ILL) Josh
- - OLMIS-2815Getting issue details... STATUS
- Paweł Gesek, please ask the leads to do this → upgrade Gradle and tooling versions (see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openlmis-dev/2LpkxEk5vFM). If everything goes to hell, please let us know so we can discuss.
Malawi Contributions
Team ILL and Ben Leibert and Sebastian Brudziński to figure out how to get the following features back into core.
- Report Service
- Performance work
- Batch approval
- blocked by refactor work in the requisition service
- UI could be structured as separate service
- UI - Login page
- Loading modal ticket
- UI - Select2
- MW-268 & MW-274
- UI - Login Service
- Configurable currency
- Cleaner version of clearing user data
Josh Zamor notes.
- Add ticket(s) for Next Step on Performance Benchmarking and performance fixes. Can we take the MW team results from OLMIS-2701 and turn it into a wiki page with a standard suite of tests we can periodically benchmark against? Mary Jo created a Non-Functional wiki page where we should clarify our non-functionality performance goals/standards. Also, MW team has specifically identified MW-366 and MW-367 to fix. (Team ILL)
- - OLMIS-2147Getting issue details... STATUS (Josh Zamor to move to todo after AC check?) (is this or - OLMIS-2611Getting issue details... STATUS a dupe of - OLMIS-1689Getting issue details... STATUS i.e. could we dead the latter)
- - OLMIS-2627Getting issue details... STATUS (Paweł Gesek Please read this ticket and let us know if you think it's feasible and how you would approach it; it would likely need guidance or involvement from you)
- - OLMIS-1329Getting issue details... STATUS (Josh Zamor to check AC)
- - OLMIS-1509Getting issue details... STATUS (Josh Zamor to update AC - ODK developers would find this useful)