2017-08-08 Meeting notes

Date

08 Aug 2017

7am PST

Meeting Link

https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/#/meetings/detail?uuid=MC4MI8V4AU87PSQRPHTS1BHJF1-3O29&rnd=240422.52612

Attendees

Goals

QA Testing Workflow
Review recent dev forum posts: migrating data cross-service
Review where we're at with performance
Review previous action items

Discussion items

Time	Item	Who	Notes
30min	Discussion of QA Testing Workflow and expectations for each sprint Presentation of Test Cycles and Test Case execution: Test Strategy Explain the purpose of Test Cycles and reporting of Test Metrics Walk through the Test Case creation & ownership	Sam Im (Deactivated)
10m	Migrating data cross service	Paweł Gesek	https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openlmis-dev/JPUUrsY5y70
15m	Performance	Josh Zamor	Performance Data Performance Tips WIP A call to be adding at least the data and tests with new endpoints (CCE?)
5	Close up / action items	Josh Zamor	July 25th action items

Notes

QA Testing Workflow

Not everyone is aware of the QA test cycles and how it should fit into the sprint. https://openlmis.atlassian.net/wiki/x/BYBUBQ

Types:

manual
automatic
regression - haven't been keeping up, will be moving into one of each sprint

Sam and or QA lead will create test cycle.

For testing we all add new tests for bugs as we fix them.

For regression testing the QA leads, Sam and Mary Jo will define which to-be-released features will have a regression test.

In grooming, QA is going to be more apart of the planning process to identify where test cases are missing. At the end of the sprint, QA will showcase the test plan, test cycle, new test cases and defect tracking. If there's any regression testing, that also will be showcased.

OLMIS-2797 has an example of testing criteria and a test case ticket that relates to it. It's important that we all ensure there's a test case so we can validate that a ticket is complete.

Each sprint has a test cycle or a regression cycle. When you create a new test, you should add it to the existing test cycle.

Unexectuted
WIP
1. Pass (only if ALL pass)
2. Fail
3. Blocked

As each step is done, update the status and add any comments if needed.

Updating test exection is kinda manual - do each step, the test itself might need to be updated manually if it doesn't prompt you.

Feedback in Monday QA (next one is on Friday) meeting and then Slack QA channel

Migrating Data Cross Service

Option 2, a cross-service script, sounds like the path. Malawi didn't have any objection.

release notes?
how to run?
should it support multiple data sources? (Malawi's only 1, is there ever any reason to have this work one more?)
is their any sort of framework or container that's re-usuable?

Performance

Action items

Sam Im to bring up if we're adopting / migrating QA workflow for the whole project at the end of sprint 32
Sam Im (Deactivated) and Paweł Gesek and Joanna Bebak (Deactivated) how to handle and resolve defects in test cases - will communicate it back to group
Paweł Gesek to writeup a ticket on the cross-service migration.