Non-Functional Requirements meeting 2018-08-02
Date
Attendees
- Chongsun Ahn (Unlicensed)
- Łukasz Lewczyński (Deactivated)
- Joanna Szymańska (Deactivated)
- Sebastian Brudziński
- Mateusz Kwiatkowski
- Klaudia Pałkowska (Deactivated)
- Paulina Buzderewicz
- Wesley Brown
Goals
- Discuss any questions about the Non-Functional Requirements - performance
- Compared to current 3.4 performance, what do we need to do to meet the NFR?
- What is the approach we should take?
- Represent what the system currently supports, current working data should reflect what the system actually supports
- We don't want to keep using Malawi data set, we want our own performance data that has the same data as Malawi
- Malawi data is only on perftest, doesn't have any stock management data, some fulfillment data
- Audit the demo data to determine how much more we need to add, if we need to take a different approach to pulling data from other implementations and scrubbing
- Propose what we want to get to (stock management)
- For stock management, is offline support important?
- Automated tests to track performance against targets
- Represent what the system currently supports, current working data should reflect what the system actually supports
- Get feedback from other things to include in the NFR
- What is the approach we should take?
Action items
- Sebastian Brudziński to create stub tickets and have Wesley Brown review
OpenLMIS: the global initiative for powerful LMIS software